This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game
what's with the crazy dictionary definition at the top?
I noticed this sentence - "The website claims older (freeware) versions of ADRIFT are still available, but the link is broken."
I have just tested the link and this is not at all true. I took the liberty of correcting it.
I have just modified one external link on ADRIFT. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
I updated the ADRIFT article to 17th of September 2021 and added references. Are we ready to remove the "Maintenance Template" and if not why?
Thanks, Commobommo
Many other sources say the same. Plus, a version from 2016 gave a negative on all fronts, not just Kaspersky TIP. I can upload a Jotti’s malware scan if you must. Xanzs (talk) 01:55, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many other reliable sources? Please show proof. Your own original research is not a reliable source. Testing executables (randomly downloaded or official) is original research, regardless of what you claim to "find". Please do not upload screenshots of non-free software, including websites. -- Kaspersky TIP is "free" as in you don't need to pay to use it. But that's not the same as it being free for Commons. Please see Gratis vs. libre. TIP is gratis, not libre. For example, FFmpeg is libre and gratis. WhoAteMyButter (🌷talk│🌻contribs) 01:58, 19 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]